The Second postulate of Relativity states that the speed of light has the same value in any inertial system of reference. The critical question is *what is an inertial system of reference?* We consider a simple device constructed by a measuring rod , a pulsing light source and a sensor at one end of the measuring rod and a mirror on the other end of the measuring rod . IF this measuring rod is an inertial system of reference, then the light will move from the source to the mirror with velocity and is reflected and moves from the mirror to the sensor with a velocity . Then it is clear that the time-difference between emitting the light by the source and receiving the light by the sensor is given by . We may represent the device by a vector which represents both the length of the measuring rod as well as the direction.

If so we may consider that this device is moving with respect to another system of reference, such that the velocity is uniform. The time required for the light ray to reach the mirror is given by . The time required for the reflected light ray to reach the sensor is given by . The path of the light ray to reach the mirror is given by and the path of the light ray to reach the sensor is given by . We can generaly say that . But we also have that . Here is associated with the light ray moving toward the mirror and is associated with the reflected light ray moving to the sensor. We have

(1) thus ,

Then it is clear that

(2a)

Then we find that

(2b)

So

(2c)

Then

(3)

This can be written as

(4a) ,

where . When we argue that we obtain

(5) .

Therfore

(6) .

Now let and , then

(7) .

Now let , and then we obtain

(8a) and

(8b) thus

(8c) .

Two special cases are:

(9)

But in general, length-contraction depends on the direction; this is a direct conclusion from the Second postulate of Relativity. Any claim that *distance*-contraction does not depend on the direction therefore violates the Second principle of Relativity.